Raanraals
Lieutenant
Attorney General
Posts: 256
|
Post by Raanraals on Mar 3, 2005 14:27:32 GMT
And while we're at it, why not a Stones poll too?
|
|
|
Post by bamos on Mar 3, 2005 15:02:47 GMT
(See my Pink Floyd comment for my views on this subject. Only substitute 'Pink Floyd' for 'Rolling Stones')
|
|
|
Post by Fullerov on Mar 3, 2005 23:33:06 GMT
I'm not voting until Raanraals does.
|
|
Raanraals
Lieutenant
Attorney General
Posts: 256
|
Post by Raanraals on Mar 3, 2005 23:37:21 GMT
Kertinkle! One for Let It Bleed. A worthy winner of my vote.
|
|
|
Post by John Brainlove on Mar 3, 2005 23:37:42 GMT
Let It Bleed is the only one I've heard. I'm not really a fan. So no vote.
|
|
|
Post by Fullerov on Mar 3, 2005 23:41:08 GMT
Sticky Fingers.
|
|
Raanraals
Lieutenant
Attorney General
Posts: 256
|
Post by Raanraals on Mar 3, 2005 23:43:11 GMT
You're all heathen. Heathen I say! The Stones and the Floyd should play an integral part in every self-respecting music fan's record collection. Get thee to HMV!
|
|
|
Post by John Brainlove on Mar 3, 2005 23:46:48 GMT
It's not that I haven't heard it. There's just something mising in it for me, personally. I don't get any great feeling from it. They had good singles, it's cool, I don't mind it, but it doesn't do anything major for me really. Dunno. Taste innit.
|
|
|
Post by Fullerov on Mar 14, 2005 22:23:36 GMT
This is the only old poll which didnt get into two pages
|
|
Raanraals
Lieutenant
Attorney General
Posts: 256
|
Post by Raanraals on Mar 16, 2005 19:43:58 GMT
I'm amazed. I don't think many people of our generation really appreciate how fucking good all these albums are. The Stones' reputation is based on more that their bloated live shows and longevity, you know.
|
|